View source for Application of income of settled residuary real or personal estate: The rule in Allhusen v Whittell


'''Queensland:'''
Abolition of rule in Allhusen v Whittell: Does not require the trustee to apportion the income produced by the gross estate.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/ta1973132/s78.html


'''New South Wales:'''
Abolition of rule in Allhusen v Whittell: Does not require the trustee to apportion the income produced by the gross estate.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/paaa1898259/s46d.html


'''Northern Territory:'''
Abolition of rule in Allhusen v Whittell: Does not require the trustee to apportion the income produced by the gross estate.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nt/consol_act/aapa259/s58.html


'''Victoria:'''
Abolition of rule in Allhusen v Whittell: Does not require the trustee to apportion the income produced by the gross estate.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ta1958122/s74.html


'''Western Australia:'''
Abolition of rule in Allhusen v Whittell: Does not require the trustee to apportion the income produced by the gross estate.


'''ACT:'''
Does not require the trustee to apportion the income produced by the gross estate.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/act/consol_act/aapa1929259/s41d.html


'''2009 Draft Uniform Legislation:'''
The model legislation should not include a provision to the effect of section 46D of the Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW).